Republican Number one Role Model, Milo Yiannopoulos, Turns Out to be a Pedophile

in Donald Trump/Family Values/Media by

Milo Yiannopoulos is the republican’s latest social weapon. He is a British writer based in the US. He is young, outspoken and flamboyantly gay. Republicans like to prance him around and show to the world that every republican is not Mitch McConnell. Don’t be fooled by his appearance though. Besides his age, there really isn’t much difference between him and the rest of that pack of republican wolves.

Another striking similarity between him and other republicans, is that he spends his life offending people. He was kicked off of Twitter for inciting venomous hatred towards Leslie Jones, a black actress in the new Ghostbusters movie. He has degraded transgender people, Muslims, Black Lives Matter activists, feminists and homosexual. Even though he is gay, he makes fun of them as well.

Related image
Many republicans found this offensive humor to be great. All the hatred and anger bubbling in the small conservative mind, Milo Yiannopoulos was expressing. According to the Daily Beast,

The 31-year-old, boastfully gay Breitbart writer—or “dangerous faggot”—has quickly become a hero to young conservatives and libertarians for smacking down the ridiculous out-of-control “social justice warriors” who troll college campuses.

Image result for milo yiannopoulos

Milo Yiannopoulos has written columns titled “Birth Control Makes Women Unattractive and Crazy” and “Would You Rather Your Child Had Feminism or Cancer?” He became a senior editor at Donald Trump’s chief strategist Steve Bannon’s white supremacist website Breitbart.
His prominence in republican circles was so great, that he was a regular guest speaker at some of the republican’s biggest events. In fact, he was supposed to speak at the influential Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Maryland this week. He was supposed to speak right before President Donald Trump. That is how much respect the republicans had for him.

Image result for milo yiannopoulos

A few days before Milo Yiannopoulos was supposed to speak at CPAC, two different videos emerged with him condoning paedophilia. In the videos, Yiannopoulos appears to be speaking sympathetically about raping little boys and he then cracks a joke about his own sexual encounter with a Catholic priest as a child.

“In the homosexual world, particularly, some of those relationships between younger boys and older men — the sort of ‘coming of age’ relationship — those relationships in which those older men help those young boys discover who they are and give them security and safety and provide them with love and a reliable, sort of rock, where they can’t speak to their parents,” he said. 
CNN Money article

This is a role model for the party of the religious right?


Image result for milo yiannopoulos

None of this should be a shock. Milo Yiannopoulos is not a republican. Milo Yiannopoulos claims to be one for the same reasons that Donald Trump claimed to be a republican. Donald Trump was a democrat his whole life. Donald Trump’s kids could not vote for their dad in the primaries because they were all registered democrats. Milo and Donald love money. Both of them have proven; create a loyal fan base, which leads to power, which leads to money.
Republicans are a lot easier to fool.

Jordan has always been a writer. He has written several novels available on Amazon.com, and he used to write his own column in "The National Enquirer". While Jordan lived in Japan for two years, he was a childhood television star. He was sort of a big deal. In a volunteer position, Jordan teaches adults how to read.


    • He doesn’t support it. He was making a reference to when he hisself was raped, and he worded it very badly.
      I bothered to look up his response. This is the only thing he has ever apologized for, and he explained it all very well. Admittedly, he has a long way to go before he can restore his reputation (understandably) but pushing him back with lies is wrong. If you wanna hate milo, hate him for being a dick. Not for being a pedophile.

    • I don’t support the alt right (which milo isn’t technically a part of, even though his fan base largely is). I do personally enjoy watching milo for the humor aspect (i have a darker sense of humor already, so what he says doesn’t bother me) and cause he’s actually really good on free speech.

      Again, watch the whole video, not the cropped one. Get both sides of the story. If you are going to make an accusation like that, you have to at least listen to the defendants side of the story.
      I also commented milos response here (main thread) so if you would like to read that, feel free

  1. Oh shit did he get caught as a client of Jeffrey Epstien? Ditching his secret service detail to take flights on a private jet used exclusively for sexual abuse?

    Oh……y’mean he said a couple of stupid things and then clarified himself and it turns out to be over sensationalism?

    Well, never mind, who was I thinking of with the Epstein thing?

    Oh right of course, the liberal demi-god

  2. He’s an absolute cock womble and a prick. But he doesn’t say anything about kids in the quotes. He’s talking about a twink/daddy relationship, which is quite common, and that is his point. He’s odious nonetheless.

    • I agree with you. He denied he was molested. I think he is in denial and it would explain his attention seeking behaviour. PTSD

      However he described it as normal. That the priest was a good man.
      Although I feel sorry for him.
      These statements cannot go unchallenged.

    • He stated that it was fine to have a “relationship” with 13 year old boys. He also stated that he was at a party where there were “very young boys ” drugged. Did he call police/notify child protection/attempt to help them? Nope. That makes him complicit in paedophilia and therefore a paedophile. Just like those who defend him/excuse him.

    • I read the article and that’s it. I listened to the odious man speak once and frankly have completely ignored him since. Much like Katie Hopkins, he seems to feed on negative publicity, I refuse to give him any. The points above were strangely missing from the article. Which surprised me as it was specifically written to inform us of his ideas regarding child abuse. I can’t comment on what was not in the article for the reasons I said above. I do hope that you’re not accusing me of defending or excusing him Brenda Gough, I’m not, I’m only going on the information provided to me in this article. If you were, frankly that’s a hurtful allegation. Your Some like it hot picture goes some way towards healing the wound.

    • Hi Adam. I watched the footage and read various articles in relation to this. I also fact checked a back history of Bryan Singer, mentioned during the interview. In understanding that you based your comments on only reading this article, I apologise for hurting your feelings. Nobody’s perfect 😉

  3. From the two articles I read…He is not a pedophile, but feels it is a coming of age for young homosexual men that seek ‘guidance’ and comfort of an older man. He gives example of him as the younger man, not the older one. ? Don’t like this guy either way. Opportunist getting his 15 seconds of fame. Hateful like the rest of these self serving republicans.

    • You wrote exactly what I was thinking. He’s an asshole for other reasons, but the treatment and labelling for this particular thing is wholly unfair. Although, seeing some of the revolting treatment he has dished out to others, it’s difficult not to feel some natural justice underway!

    • He’s ON VIDEO defending his parish priest. He actually says word for word that 13yr old boys and 28yr old men is ok!!!!
      Wtf…you think that’s ok for him to be spouting out shit like that? Have you heard the whole tape…ALL OF THEM?

    • Let me ask you?
      Because I’m 47 and have a 14yr old. If a man…almost 30yrs old were to be in anyway even thinking about sex with my CHILD…because yes…they have not reached sexual maturity…I would be infuriated.
      That he would advertise this like it’s ok…hell no. It basically means he would do the same.

    • Yessss Jeanne Acosta-Caipe. There are also victims that go on to offend. As to their reasons I would agree it’s usually tied directly back into the original abuse. However it doesn’t mean they should be given a soundboard to defend that abuse. And yep…he did say that transgender people are more likely to commit sexual assault. Milo is definitely a sick pup.

    • He’s is speaking from his own experience only, referring to his encounters. You are absolutely correct it is revolting to “condone” the actions of a pedo priest – grotesque in itself… HOWEVER condemning Milo for reference to his personal experience is really rough. He should be condemned for just about everything else he says, of course, he’s a fascist POS, but not for his own personal experience. NB: he at 13 did absolutely nothing wrong and should feel zero guilt for what happened. Clearly he doesn’t feel guilt around it and for that I salute this otherwise revolting excuse for a human being.

    • He spent 20mins defending whether boys should be considered victims and he went even furthur into that boys are not victims when a grown FEMALE teachers has sex with them. Obviously you haven’t heard the whole thing.
      As for his personal experience…of course he did nothing wrong. What he’s saying now is COMPLETELY different then what he said on tape. And btw it’s like a 3 hr interview. One of those all morning interviews…he said a lot. What he never said though was he was a victim and believed boys should be protected.

  4. It’s on tape. See the New York Times Article. To be clear, he defended pedophilia and older men sleeping with pubescent 13-year-old boys. Excerpt:
    “No, no, no. You’re misunderstanding what pedophilia means,” Mr. Yiannopoulos says on the tape, in which he is talking to radio hosts in a video chat. “Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13 years old who is sexually mature. Pedophilia is attraction to children who have not reached puberty,” he adds, dismissing the fact that 13-year-olds are children.

    The notion of consent, he says, is “arbitrary and oppressive.”

    At one point in the video, an unknown speaker says that the behavior being defended by Mr. Yiannopoulos is akin to molestation by Catholic priests. Mr. Yiannopoulos responds, in an ironic tone, by crediting a priest for having helped develop his sexual technique.

  5. It’s on tape. It’s been reported by multiple reliable sources. Even Breitbart is talking internally about dropping him. As Trump has, if you cry fake news every time you don’t like what’s being reported, you lose all credibility.

  6. Anthony, One of the first steps to creating a fascist autocratic society is to attempt to discredit all media and, without a watchdog press, leaving the door open to unchecked corruption and propaganda. I referenced and excerpted the New York Times. Also see NPR: After Underage Sex Comments, Milo Yiannopoulos Loses CPAC Invite, Book Deal. Also, try doing your own google search before crying fake news. The stakes, Anthony, are too high.

    • I agree, discrediting the media is the first step to silencing them. It doesn’t help when the media discredits themselves though. Many have started to clean up their act (I’ve seen much less fake news from CNN, but it’s still there) but there are plenty that still spew innaccurate bs to where calling the mainstream media trash is justified.

      I am aware of everyones response to his comments, but just like the exccentric response to pewdiepie making nazi-supporting comments, the response to milo is excessive and is only to avoid being connected with the slander.

      Please watch the full clip, not just the spliced version used by the mainstream, and read milos response as well. He admits his inappropriate wording, apologizes, and provides a very good explaination for his self

    • Fair statement Anthony Pucci. Again, I’m wary of all press, but the Times is pretty damn good at collating various sources and presenting information representatively. They paper did not call him a pedophile though and it would be fair to categorize the headline of the original FB post as hyperbole.

  7. Where are the voices of the victims? Also, I would not ban, say CNN, rather I would give a greater voice to many others whose voices have been suppressed for about 30 years. Lets have the truth – I very much doubt any of your academics would debate with me the findings of my last book (see Anthony Ravlich Google+). The modus operandi of the so-called liberal left (actually a social class with delusions of grandeur) has been to hide in their offices and elite circles rather than an open debate with individuals like myself.

  8. Your main points discredited, you offer instead a circular argument aggrandizing yourself and disparaging liberalism in general (See The Art of War by Sun Tsu for other ploys lawyers and propagandists use to twist logic and sway the uninformed). Without any knowledge of the facts, you cried fake news, then try to assume an authoritative position even as you condemn academic elites. The worst kind of hypocrisy. An intentional twisting of the truth in order to serve an idealogical agenda.

  9. Look you are damn lucky I bother to even talk to you. Its because I don’t hate you rather I pity you because my book shows the human rights agenda the so-called liberals promote stem from an interpretation of human rights (involving many omissions) determined very largely by criminal States at the UN. In my view, they grovel at the feet of evil. That why I pity you. But my forgiveness does not extend to the leadership of the so-called liberals who need to be held to account for their low cunning and gross deceit when it comes to human rights.

  10. i think if anything the republicans will be relieved that the democrats are upset about it at all. the republicans were worried that all the democrats were pedophiles so this actually brings the estimated u.s. pedo count down by millions.

    • Yet in that interview with Rogan states he was witness to statutory rape on more than ine occasion and clearly didn’t consider this worthy enough to go to the authorities. He is either tacitly condoning pedophilia or he is a lieing and has no one to name and is saying this just for attention. In either instance i hope his fame is fleeting and quickly forgotten

    • To be more specific, he said that he say young people who appeared to be quite young at Hollywood parties where there was sex and drugs. He didn’t specifically state that he saw them having sex. However, it goes without saying that he should have reported it to the authorities.

    • It’s not my intention to defend Milo in this instance. He did in fact say some troubling things.

      With that being said, the left has been doing a lot of bullying and slandering lately. Most commonly they label people racists without evidence. Not to mention the violence and intimidation directed towards conservative speakers.

      One reason that I defended Milo in the past is because the left would attack him personally or take his comments out of context. This is obviously wrong.

      In regards to this latest video. A lot of news outlets are saying things like “in a recently uncovered video,” or “a new video has just surfaced.” I find this to be somewhat misleading. Milo made these comments on the Joe Rogan podcast and got millions of views. It was extensively criticized by networks such as The Young Turks who never thought to mention the part about pedophilia until recently. Why that is I don’t know.

    • we are talking about the same man who in the same interview talks about gay being a choice. In the video he talks about it as his first sexual experiences and says he is the predator, but post people hearing his comments he makes a public post talking about being the victim? He just knows how to redirect everything in an attempt to save his ass. I don’t know. He is a wealthy man, has been came from a wealthy family. The wealthy should not be the ones commenting on society.

  11. Unfortunately though, the example that he gives about himself sounds like statutory sexual assault by an older male. To me it sounds like he was pretty messed up and didn’t know how to deal with that and decided to embrace it rather than think of himself as a victim. I feel kind of bad for him, but he’s still a douchebag.

    • And it’s also very possible he would think it would be ok for him to do to younger boy.
      Also him claiming his priest was “a great man” and taught him how to give a blowjob etc. What kinda message is that. Would he turn a blind eye if he knew of a priest doing that?

  12. Your narcissistic egoism aside Anthony, lots of evil on the left and right. The neoliberals, starting with Bill Clinton and on through Obama, were importantly supportive of social progress, but championed economic policies that shrunk the middle class and left rural America in a shambles. Both parties’ hawkish globalization agenda selectively ignored abhorrent human rights violations and served, intentionally, to destabilize the world so that we could wield more control over it. None of these truths abstain you from your original trollish, unsubstantiated and uninformed cry of fake news. And in absolutely no way would I ever consider myself lucky to be talking to you.

  13. I very much doubt you would be talking to me if Trump had not won. But you may find the ethical approach to human rights in my book may well be the savior of the left in the end if the so-called left liberals would adopt something that is fair and does not give them considerable unearned privileges.

    • Hey GW Eff, Anthony is multitasking: simultaneously self-promoting and trolling. Milo has not been accused by anyone else of committing pedophilia. However, he has been taped in interviews and a speech justifying adult males sleeping with 13-year-old boys. Our boy Anthony is an anti-intellectual posing as a pseudo-intellectual.

  14. This should surprise no one. Consider this: Both past(Bill Clinton) & present( Donald Trump) Presidents are implicated in acts of sex with underage girls, often trafficked. If thee highest ranking men in america are culpable of such vile, predatory behaviour, then why the shock when a political attention seeker such as this is accused of similar crimes by his own admission?

  15. Everyone is calling this Milo goon a pedophile which is really weird. What he is called “histrionic”. He is a mental case, but not necessarily a pedophile. If he is a pedo, then arrest him! All his bizarre statments he makes indicatez he seeks attention by being overly dramatic and outrageous, forms inappropriate sexual relationships–all classic examples of histrionic behaviors.

  16. I defend neither, but here’s the difference. It’s already been proven that Gloria Aldrich helped her recent client to LIE about Trump and she had to shamefully recant her statements. Gloria is another Liberal who has been employed in the Take Down of the Donald. Donald has been single a couple times in between marriages. Bill has been “married” the whole time. What their partnership/arrangement is Could be just THEIR Business except they’ve spent Decades LYING about it, with $HilLIARy actively Threatening the extra-marital women. I am FB Friends with one of Bill’s consensual Gal Pals from the ’80’s, who IS a Real Person. She fully understood that the Clinton “Marriage” didn’t include exclusivity, as Hillbilly also did what SHE wanted. Bill wanted to Divorce Hillary Diane a couple times (he wanted to marry his childhood sweetheart Dolly Kyle) but she threatened BOTH of them. Bill Clinton on the other hand has had numerous Women truthfully relate their experiences with him, starting with Why he had to leave Oxford as a young man. Eileen Wellstone is a REAL Person who was really forced into Intercourse with Bill Clinton. Back then women weren’t very prone to press charges…..the Victim was treated Worse than the criminal. Bill had to transfer to Yale (the home of many secret societies that groom future legislators, Congressmen, Judges, Lawyers, CEO’s, etc.). and it’s no surprise THEY took him under those circumstances. Anderson Cooper, the grandson of the 2nd wealthiest American family at one time (Gloria Vanderbilt is his mother) works at….??? …..you got it…..CNN! and HE belonged to a couple of these Societies. We all heard about Donald dating someone else while still technically married……it’s not a secret. and I doubt HE ever Threatened Somebody’s LIFE like $HilLIARy did to my FB Friend! I’ve been single in between marriages, I was seeing someone else before my divorce that time was Official, my state had a 6 month waiting period before granting it, and I had a blast for 10 years before remarrying the third time later on. Would you also like to see MY homemade video me and a “friend” did one time? http://endingthefed.com/breaking-ex-apprentice-summer-zervos-paid-500000-by-gloria-allred-to-accuse-trump-deal-went-to-others-too.html

  17. Coming to terms is like negotiating with the event within yourself. By changing the way you frame the abuse, changing your perception of it, changes your feelings about it. It doesn’t make him a pedophile, what would make him a pedophile is liking children sexually. I know you aren’t that stupid, but to be so hateful to smear a person as a pedophile is actually worse that being an idiot.

  18. Just throw the insult “Paedo” at him and it removes any credibility. It’s an easy trick.

    Just wait till nearer the General election and the Daily hate has the massive headline “JEREMY CORBYN IS A PAEDOPHILE”

    And in smaller letters the next line reads

    “So a blogger claims on social media”

    You don’t read the story, just the headline and that’s it, Corbyn is labelled a nonce.

    Easy peasy Japanesey.

    • The headline is indeed hyperbole. Irresponsible in my eyes, subjective, but not quite fake. Doesn’t change what he said on tape, despite his eloquent rebuttal and cries of unfair editing. Who jokes about taking their sexual cues toward adolescent boys from catholic priests? Recall that some of the most fervent republican gay-bashers have turned out to be homosexual themselves. It would not be so strange (in fact it would be more the norm) for Milo’s professional (and designed for public consumption) rails against pedophilia to run contrary to his personal beliefs or practices. Again, the NY times does a nice job of collating information and presenting more comprehensive view.

    • His flippant public statement professing to take his sexual cues toward young boys from Catholic priests is dramatically wrong, yes. People play violent video games, watch slasher films and harbor secret violent or abusive sexual fetishes without acting on these primal darker human physiological desires. Practicing or advocating murder, sexual assault or pedophilia as a public figure is, even in jest (though the greater context suggests at least acquiescence if not advocation) is absolutely wrong and furthermore dangerous to normalize or rationalize.

    • You mean locker room talk? Just joking around, huh? I respect your logic defining “fake news” to include hyperbolic headlines and unproven accusations. From there, we all have to make our own personal decisions where we come down on an individual’s collective world view and actions. Milo, to me, is most certainly advocating at least consensual sex with minors. Where any of our individual moral compasses come down on that particular issue is another discussion.

    • Listen to the whole three hours and you will get how much of an asshole he is but that was not proof he is not a pedo. A complete piece of shit troll sure but not a pedo.

      Let’s put actual issues on the board and not hyperbolic claims that get the real argument dismissed.

  19. Here is Milo Yiannopoulos’ response to the pedophile incident (since i know y’all ain’t gonna look that up yourselves)

    “I am a gay man, and a child abuse victim.

    I would like to restate my utter disgust at adults who sexually abuse minors. I am horrified by pedophilia and I have devoted large portions of my career as a journalist to exposing child abusers. I’ve outed three of them, in fact — three more than most of my critics. And I’ve repeatedly expressed disgust at pedophilia in my feature and opinion writing. My professional record is very clear.

    But I do understand that these videos, even though some of them are edited deceptively, paint a different picture.

    I’m partly to blame. My own experiences as a victim led me to believe I could say anything I wanted to on this subject, no matter how outrageous. But I understand that my usual blend of British sarcasm, provocation and gallows humor might have come across as flippancy, a lack of care for other victims or, worse, “advocacy.” I deeply regret that. People deal with things from their past in different ways.

    As to some of the specific claims being made, sometimes things tumble out of your mouth on these long, late-night live-streams, when everyone is spit-balling, that are incompletely expressed or not what you intended. Nonetheless, I’ve reviewed the tapes that appeared last night in their proper full context and I don’t believe they say what is being reported.

    I do not advocate for illegal behavior. I explicitly say on the tapes that I think the current age of consent is “about right.”

    I do not believe sex with 13-year-olds is okay. When I mentioned the number 13, I was talking about the age I lost my own virginity.

    I shouldn’t have used the word “boy” — which gay men often do to describe young men of consenting age — instead of “young man.” That was an error.

    I am certainly guilty of imprecise language, which I regret.

    Anyone who suggests I turn a blind eye to illegal activity or to the abuse of minors is unequivocally wrong. I am implacably opposed to the normalization of pedophilia and I will continue to report and speak accordingly.

    Previous statement: https://www.facebook.com/myiannopoulos/posts/851263248344905

  20. Thanks for sharing this. It’s a well written rebuttal, akin to the Trump crew’s carefully crafted “locker room talk” recovery campaign. I will absolutely agree that the original post should not have called Milo a pedophile (and the Times didn’t) even though he advocates, on tape (then blames editing) that he takes his sexual cues from pedophiliac priests. Hyperbole gets us nowhere, but this guy has shown his true colors and deserves the backlash.

  21. I know what they’re referring to and I’m against any form of pedophilia and believe the death penalty should be brought against anyone who is found beyond the shadow of a doubt to be guilty of child molestation and tape. That being said, him being casual about it and joking about how he was molested by his priest doesn’t make him a pedophile. We can’t prove that he, himself is however it’s disgusting for him to talk about it so casually and make it okay. It almost seems he’s either lying about what happened to him or he’s making excuses so he doesn’t have to deal with it. Do I think he molests children? Nope. Do I think he has a very unhealthy attitude about pedophilia and pretty much everything else? Yep.

  22. yeah, he’s talked about man/boy love in an apprenticeship sort of fashion much like Romans n Greeks did…

    There’s a reason we don’t allow that anymore.

    Whether or not a child can make a decision. for better or worse we have an obligation to ensure the vast majority ARE capable of understanding the choice.

  23. but he did call trans people mentally deranged pedophiles who are “statistically more likely to commit sex crimes” and are after “women and children.”

    he’s a disgusting piece of shit.

    this trans woman is more likely to commit his murder than a sex crime. tyvm.

  24. Hey, didn’t they do the same thing to WikiLeaks. NEVER FORGET THAT. The social media outlets can be used to sway the narrative. Stay on against ignorant GOP policies and removing establishment Dems. EVERYTHING ELSE IS JUST NOISE AND STATIC distractions. In other words, STOP SHARING THIS GARBAGE.

  25. You lot on here…..he is not making the ‘Alt right’ look alright…he is showing the fascist far left for what they are. If people see this TRUTH, and decide that his line of reasoning is better than hitting people who you do not agree with, then that is a fair argument. Calling someone a paedeophile because they have differing opinions shows how low you will stoop to avoid an actual debate.

  26. I’ve always expected that creep to take an epic fall . That’s what happens to kiss ass Aunt Toms who think they can handle the fascists . They get chewed up and spat out and have no friends anywhere . And they don’t deserve any .

  27. The truth became irrelevant to the left liberals. It was all about power but now they have lost much power. They cannot fight back using truth anymore so they are reduced to personal attacks in some vein hope to destroy a person’s credibility. In my view, its all very pathetic and sooner or later they will have to do what they fear most which is looking at themselves. Turning inwards and becoming isolated is not a happy prospect.

  28. No. Their star is the Liberace of tea party politics. He can say outrageous things that upset liberals and be dismissed as simply being outrageous…Then while everyone is distracted with this fake charge he Wanted made. Tea party gives even more to the 1%

  29. I believe in universal human rights truth which I believe also reflects God’s Universal Truth which, in my view, will prevail even if humans choose evil. Milo, unlike the so-called liberal left, has character – he’ll be back. Whereas the liberal left may not be.

    • Well I realize in todays world people find it hard to cope with the spiritual but that is because they have become slaves to the State – when you are free you find another dimension within yourself. I have written two books on human rights based on my secular belief in ethical human rights. I have international cred in my work. But I still believe in God and experience a spiritual development as well as an intellectual development. Your founding fathers believed in God also Many have become captives of the State. I prefer to think for myself.

    • Yeah, but in his case, he is trying to assimilate his abuse in a way that less self destructive. He is doing this out in public when he should be doing his therapy in a doctor’s office or some other place where 10,000 people are *not* at hand to take his crazy talk seriously or the wrong way. But histrionics need attention… So we get Milo’s issues in our faces–why anyone thinks this is some kind of wisdom when he is still struggling to recover is beyond me. This kind of conversation is not fit for public consumption.

    • Justin O’Hea I have not heard anything that glorifies pedophilia, I am just hearing the words of someone that is hella screwed up. I don’t even think he is really gay, everything he is doing seems to still be a reaction to his abuse, or he is trying to cash in on it… (or both at the same time!)

  30. “I might be a dick-sucking faggot, but I fucking hate the left … the left in this country is a cancer that you need to eradicate,” Milo Yiannopoulos said to rousing applause at the Republican National Convention last year, proving that the right is not as homophobic as we once thought, but as hateful as we always knew. http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/02/21/at_a_press_conference_discarded_troll_milo_yiannopoulos_faced_a_world_where.html

Leave a Reply

Latest from Donald Trump

Go to Top